The debate that has erupted with the voluntary resignation of Peter Nover, is bizarre. Peter Noever was already well above the retirement age, multiple verlängerterr life, he had unanzweifelhafte merits - no one has used his time favorable budget situation ("Museum billion") as quickly and comprehensively - but he is now also suspected of dirty business. This could
make a distinction between actually, wait patiently, if anything, result in the investigation and on the other hand, a differentiated pull the ambivalent balance of a long term. Instead, there are borders on the ridiculous debt relief initiatives and homage addresses, public expressions of identificatory solidarity, in which Noevers personality is the epitome of the anti-bourgeois subversion convert (Herbert Lach Meyer in THE PRESS of 4.3.), But no differentiated discussion of merits and weaknesses of Directorate Noever.
No? However, there is one. Just a mail drop by drop into my inbox with a link to the Courthouse lundi / artmagazine (I have quoted quite a few times because I find great merit of this column), where Vitus Weh writes pleasantly differentiated and farewell party on the sonderbatren hype Noever. "Museums must rotate" (7.3.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment